Giuliani follows up disastrous Hannity appearance with equally damaging Fox & Friends spot – ThinkProgress - Indian News Xpress

Indian News Xpress

This website is about to indian and Breaking News. Stay Tuned To The Latest News Stories From India And The World. Access Videos And Photos On Your Device With The Indian News Xpress Website....

Breaking

Home Top Ad

Post Top Ad

Responsive Ads Here

Thursday, 3 May 2018

Giuliani follows up disastrous Hannity appearance with equally damaging Fox & Friends spot – ThinkProgress

[ad_1]


A day after contradicting Donald Trump’s and longtime Trump general counsel Michael Cohen’s claims that the president knew nothing about Cohen’s payments to Stormy Daniels, Rudy Giuliani contradicted himself in a Fox & Friends interview.


The former New York City Mayor and current Trump legal team member insisted that the payments were personal, not political — but moments later demonstrated that they were indeed campaign related.



On Thursday morning, Giuliani first said that the payment was to protect the Trump family from a “six year old, false allegation” that Donald Trump had had an extramarital affair.


“If we had to defend this as not being a campaign contribution, I think we could do that,” he said. “This is for personal reasons. The was the president had been hurt personally, not politically, personally so much — and the first lady — by some of the false allegations.  That one more false allegation six years old, I think [Cohen] was trying to help the family. For that he’s treated like some kind of villain.”


Giuliani added that the $130,000 payment was “to save not so much their marriage, as much as their reputation.”


But then moments later, Giuliani noted the political reason for the payment. “Imagine if that came out of October 15, 2016, in the middle of the last debate with Hillary Clinton…” he said. “Cohen made it go away. He did his job.”





If Cohen indeed made the payment — either as a gift or even as a loan without interest — to aid Trump politically, it could be considered an illegal and unreported campaign contribution in excess of the $2,700 federal contribution limit that was in effect for the 2016 campaign.












[ad_2]

Source link

No comments:

Post a Comment

Post Bottom Ad

Responsive Ads Here

Pages